Grotentraast catalyst (not done)

I want to keep it a secret until it’s done and I’m doing it as fast as I can.

I assume some stars (the ones without supernovae) and our own sun could possibly work with: copper, gold, and palladium, becuase I think nuclear hydrogen fusions would appear more bluish & purple, instead of being red & (orange/yellow), due to having more energetic light, alhough the charge density influences the view. I assume that creating an actuall star would be too hot for power plants, while the gravity should be strong enough to keep the stars & sun together (avoiding expansion). I also assume that the pressure prevents the formation of charged plasma, which would break molecular bonds. The catalyst probably works at the core, while the outer layer of CO2 and H2O isolates heat for a bit. Let’s hope that our sun isn’t something less energetic. Uranium & plutonium bombs are based of nuclear fission as known with radioactivity. It’s Maybe without palladium in the sun’s case, or maybe with palladium as well. Blue gas flames perhaps get their colour by nitrogen. It has maybe nothing to do with complete combustion, like someone in my past convinced me by now. It’s probably a mixture of methane and nitrogen. I have no trouble to believe that some stars could be nucluar based but just look at the sunrise. I assume that atmospheric layers play a role too.

Nicotine is a negative catalyst as an exception, while people used to believe that something like that was impossible, due to thermodynmaics. (TOBACCO EXITS OUT OF MORE COMPOUNDS THOUGH, so I’m not sure about that). It’s because tobacco burns slowly at a high temperature, while being refined (high distribution rate) and a sigarette burn doesn’t hurt that much at a high temperature.

The gold is inspired by the golden coin from Pikmin 2 by Nintendo. It started with the coin and then I thought about the song burn by Ellie Goulding and then I searched the gold bars on Google. I GUESS that I would have searched it without the song burn, but it came in a flash. I assume that the song burn is inspired by my Internet activity, and I never got money for it. I noticed the gold in music AFTERWARD. Bea Miller and Christina Perri came after me, just saying. I even doubt that I searched the gold bars due to the song after some digging in my mind (the flash), in the end.

It wouldn’t be a silly idea, even with interstellar travel, so the following is also one of my dreams.

I don’t know which hydrocarbons are exactly formed, but this is an example. Eight is my lucky number.

We touch the gold with entropy and heat. We could create an endless flame by burning fuel like hydrocarbons with Grotentraast gold in a cycle (Estimation alloy around: gold 81,667%, copper 8,333%, palladium 10%, ASSUMMING THAT THE BLURRED GOLD BARS AT THE PICTURE ABOVE ARE MADE OF CROWN GOLD) as catalytic grains (NOT POWDER, SO IT SHOULDN’T BE TOO REFINED).

I know that gold powder would have to solvate inside the copper palladium mixture, while we solidify it afterward.

https://www.google.com/search?q=combustion+engine&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjKqOypmu7iAhVIY1AKHc8pAxEQ_AUIECgB&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgdii=IDUSO71MkLIe8M:&imgrc=YrBQQ9RtuFJfzM:

This version of the combustion engine wasn’t the original. IT SEEMS REALLY WRONG CONCERNING THE POINT OF IGNITION. I of course knew all the time that the hydrocarbons are ignited by a spark plug. I guess that the explosions makes the neodymium rods give a downwards moment (Dutch word) at the axises. The axises exits out of some more compartments: a neodymium cylinder on both sides and a neodymium orby part fused to the neodymium cylinder on both sides). The circular part of the neodymium cylinder and the neodymium orb should be the same. The neodymium cylinders of the neodymium axises are briefly above the bottom of the crankshaft and pretty almost at the top too (so from almost bottom to the pretty top of it). The neodymium orb and neodymium cylinder should be big enough. The neodymium rods should be the same shape as on the picture/video of the combustion engine, while the neodymium axis of that rod, so not the crankshaft, should be around the neodymium cylinder. The same rods (like on the picture/video) should above be fused to the sides of the cylinders (more below) The neodymium axises rotates the crankshaft, which is partialy made of neodymium and partialy made of another magnetic matarial downwards (more below), while the magnetic crankshaft keeps moving (the crankshaft goes upwards afterward), so the neodymium rods will rotate upwards afterward by the magnetic crankshaft (by the same neodymium axis), so the original block which only moves up and down, moves up in the end. The original block which only moves up and down (with the new extra part fused) should move all the way up to the ceiling. (More about the extra part below) THE CRANKSHAFT SHOULD FACE ABOVE IN REST (THE OPPOSITE OF THE PICTURE/VIDEO OF THE COMBUSTION ENGINE), BUT IT SHOULD NOT PERFECTLY BE IN BALANCE, SO THE CRANKSHAFT TENDS A BIT TO THE THE RIGHT BY USING A SLIGHTLY HEAVIER SUPERMAGNETIC (partial supermagnetic neodymium for the crankshaft) The crankshaft’s right side is as seen from the front, becuase it’s mirrored on the other side of course. Some matarials can be made to be magnetic with another magnet. The combustion chamber and the original block which only moves up and down is probably better of being square shaped. There is a platform inside the combustion chamber which totally closes the chamber and the platform has a sqaure shaped hole inside, which is smaller than the platform, so it leaves an edge. The block which only moves up and down doesn’t fit through the sqaure shaped hole, so the block lays on the the egde when in rest. We however fuse a neodymium new extra smaller block to the original block. The new extra neodymium smaller block fits through the sqaure shaped hole. The block tightly fits vertically (completely closes vertially), while it horizontally leaves empty space, so the rods can fit through the empty space. The top of the neodymium rods should above be fused to the sides of the neodymium cylinders, which aren’t too thick or thin, while having the right diameter. Those same neodymium cylinders are fused to the center of the neodymium new extra smaller block where it has empty space. I guess that most of the combustion engine should just be fused including the crankshaft. It would otherwise be carved. The walls of the combustion engine should of course be thick enough to endure the explosion. THE REST OF THE COMBUSTION ENGINE (biggest part) SHOULD MAYBE NOT BE METALIC, DUE TO MAGNETISM (MAYBE CARBON FIBER). The moving parts of the combustion engine would sag a little in rest (mainly by gravity and a bit by the hydrocarbons too) I don’t mean the hatches and propellor of course. It sags pretty stable becuase the hydrocarbons viscosity is quite high, while the crankshaft should however be balanced enough to endure this.

!!!!!!

GO TO: Energy infrastructure

Making the relatively tiny version of the combustion engine:

We first make 3 walls then we make an entire sqaure shaped platform, while there’s a smaller sqaure shaped hole inside the sqaure shaped platform, so the hole leaves an edge. Then we make the fourth wall against the entire sqaure shaped edge. The fourth wall is partial open. We then rest the block which only moves up and down on the edge, while a new extra smaller fused block goes/fits through the sqaure shaped hole. The original block fits very tightly inside the combustion chamber with motor oil. We then fuse the rods to the smaller extra block which fits through the hole, while fusing the neodymium axis of the neodymium rods (like on the picture/video of the combustion engine) around those neodymium cylinders. We then make the wall higher, while leaving sqaure shaped holes inside the wall by préventif fusing. We close the combustion chamber’s ceiling after we make the hatches at the square shaped holes (more below) The first hatch is at the combustion chamber’s ceiling at the side, but there’s a bit of space between the second hatch at the side and the ceiling though. We also make an incomming pipe at the first hatch, so the pipe which makes the hydrocarbons flow to the combustion engine. while having a big enough container with hydrocarbons. I could never have come with all of this on my own though. I wrote about supermagnetic parts above and below: I also wrote about how the rods are fused above:

MORE BELOW:

The combustion engine is necessary for the high enough temperature for the catalyst, so I assume that the exhaust fumes should immediately go to the catalyst block after the giant combustion chamber and sqaure pipe. Heating water inside pipes won’t suffice, but I’m not sure anymore when the entire chamber is filled with hydrocarbons along with sucking, but the chamber probably explodes that way in the end. I DOUBT IF JUST A GIANT COMBUSTION CHAMBER WITH PIPES CONTAINING WATER WILL DO. More hydrocarbons means higher temperatures, although it get’s lower because the area would also be bigger. It’s all to spin the supermagnetic crankshaft (partial neodymium) or the supermagnetic neodymium hollow cylinder B with the trapping edge (the trapping edge wouldn’t be magnetic or even sensitive to magnetism though), OR/AND the supermagnetic neodymium part of the rod BELOW at the side of the cylinder thing from the combustion engine at the generator. I assume that two generators on both sides won’t make a difference. I guess that the combustion engine should be somewhat wider than the generator, pure for design. It maybe even works better that way. Grains of gold don’t cover the resin completely, so we maybe use small orby bricks. THEIR BACK COULD BE STUCK IN AMBER, WHILE REFLLECTING THE HEAT. I wonder if we can just stick the small orby bricks. I have more faith in the amber. We can heat the resin from the other side, because the gold bricks isolate heat, in case it’s necessary. It probably works better than fusing rows of golden bricks or electrically galvanizing bricks, because gold normally doesn’t have chemical properties. IT CAN’T GO ON FOR AN ETERNITY WHEN THE CYCLE ISN’T PERFECT. The small bricks probably don’t need to be orby. I ASSUME IN THE END THAT THEY PROBABLY SHOULDN’T BE SMALL ORBY BRICKS, BECUASE IT WOULD INHIBIT THE FLOW OF THE FORMED OXYGEN AND HYDROCARBONS. The bricks shouldn’t be too big. The amber layer shouldn’t be too thin and not too thick either. We totally cover the resin by golden bricks of Grotentraast gold. Again, we could heat it from the other side, becuase it isolates heat.

GO TO: Maracta tree.

The following is different than the picture of the combustion engine: The bottom of the combustion engine on the picture could maybe make itself shove. It would otherwise be a nice design.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

We have square shaped deep holes/pipes inside the combuation engine or circular pipes outside the combustion engine. The pipe transition would be a circular hole like I wrote way below before.

The hydrocarbons enter the combustion engine through a square shaped deep hole/pipe and afterward through a sqaure shaped hatch, while leaving as exhaust fumes through a square shaped deep hole/pipe with an almost sqaure shaped hatch. The first hatch has the door porter inside the first sqaure shaped pipe/deep hole. The hatches only close in one direction (sort of like a door without a gap but with my cylinder way). The hatches would have to be strong and sturdy. The hatches shouldn’t be too big or too thin too. The hatches could automatically close by gravity, when we align them properly. The first hatch closes faster when it’s magnetic. The hydrocarbons flows down into the combustion engine, because the pipe is underneath the surface of the hydrocarbons, and the first hatch could be low in density (easy to move for the moment), while being sturdy. The flow could also be stronger than you might at first think. We should maybe track the time how long it takes to make it flow back to the container, because it’s possible that the hydrocabon’s surface maybe gets beneath the pipe. We would time the ignition with the spark plug, so we wait until the first hatch is closed, because we don’t want to burn everything at once of course. Again, I assume that the first hatch closes faster when it’s magnetic. The first hatch never opens by the the explosion, while the second hatch indirectly opens by the explosion. It should rather be the oppossite for the first hatch even when it’s made of the same matarial of the block which only moves up and down (including the new extra part). The thing that only moves up and down opens the second hatch by moving up, due to the explosion. We don’t make the second hatch magnetic, becuase that would inhibit the flow of hydrocarbons. The second hatch doesn’t open up entirely from the beginning of the explosion, because the block that only moves up and down (including the new ectra part) would be EASIER TO MOVE (the moment in this case) than the second hatch, so the second hatch hopefully stays pretty closed, until the same block moves up (inluding the new extra part). I mean the thing which only moves up and down for the previous (including the new extra part). I don’t mean the rotating crankshaft and rotating rod for the part that only moves up and down. I assume that covering the magnetic hatch to heat is unnecessary. The materials don’t rust, because they aren’t exposed to water and oxygen at the same time. This would probably be a lot earlier if they didn’t fool me at the time. THE SECOND HATCH IS OPTIONALLY DEEPER INTO THE COMBUSTION ENGINE FOR SHOVING THE CATALYST AND SUCH. The exit side of the combustion engine would thus be larger or we enlarge the entrance space of the combustion engine for design measures too. The part that only moves up and down maybe actually moves SLIGHTLY SIDEWAYS TOO, so we maybe have to take that into account. THE SECOND HATCH MAYBE OPENS AT THE SAME TIME AS THE FIRST, DUE TO THE HYDROCARBONS SURFACE INSIDE THE CONATINER, SO I PRAY THAT THE RIGHT DENSITY AND ESPECIALLY THE HIGH VISCOSITY AND PERHAPS THE RIGHT THICKNESS OF THE SECOND HATCH COULD PREVENT THAT PROBLEM. Both hatches should maybe be the same thickness though, because the first hatch should be sturdy too. Imagine a tight square around the honeycomb LIKE structure as deep hole/pipe here. The second square shaped deep hole/pipe is for the almost perfectly squared hatch (not precisely sqaured) before the catalyst and pipe transition (more below). The length of the sqaure shaped pipe until the catalyst is slightly longer then the hatch’s measurements, becuase the second hatch shouldn’t block the honeycomb like structure inside the sqaure shaped pipe at the entrance of the catalyst when it’s entirely open. The almost beginning of the second sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe has my hinges tightly fused at the second hatch and at the ceiling of the second sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe with a door porter at the start of the second shaped sqaure deep hole/pipe. The almost beginning of the second sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe is due to the door porter. The hinges are the reason why the second hatch isn’t perfectly sqaured. The second hatch should maybe be without a door porter, so my hinges can be fused at the sqaure shaped deep hole’s/pipe’s ceiling at the very beginning. I have more faith in the previous. The first hatch is just sqaure shaped (more way below). I guess that the closure of the first hatch isn’t a bother, due to a process which I think is called diffusion. We could maybe use Iron for the first hatch and lead for the second harder to move second hatch. We could maybe replace the lead with some other metal or some aloys. Osmium could maybe oxidize, in case that’s a problem, but we could coat it. Osmium could be too heavy too. The thing which only moves up and down could maybe be made of carbon fiber like probably most of the combsution engine It’s just a suggestion and there could MAYBE be other options. AGAIN, THE REST OF THE COMBUSTION ENGINE SHOULD MAYBE NOT BE METALIC, DUE TO MAGNETISM (MAYBE CARBON FIBER). The first hatch can even be made of carbon fiber, but it wouldn’t close faster by magentism and the stream of hydrocarbons into the combustion chamber would be stronger, in case that’s a problem. The left hatch has the open side at the left and vice versa.

GO TO: Quaving pack (for the hinge)

We could put a camera inside the container to notice how fast it flows back, becuase it doesn’t flow to the combustion engine when the surface of hydrocarbons are below the pipe. We maybe also put a sturdy camera inside the combustion chamber, due to the opening and closing time of the first hatch. I afterward assume that the hydrocarbons block the sight of the first hatch. Unless we make a camera at the door porter with a build in lamp.

The hexagon edges shouldn’t melt (more way below). The temperature maybe doesn’t increase anymore after a certain point, becuase I suppose that there is a temperature where the given heat eguals the taken heat, so I pray that we can find the right matarials, including the harder to move second hatch. The SAME for the easier to move first hatch and especially for the easier to move thing which only moves up and down (with the new extra part). The matarial should melt to fuse, so I hope that we can find a meltable matarial with a high enough melt temperature for the cycle, while being able to fuse or we should GALVANIZE the hexagons (more way below), in case that’s possible. We would have to figure this one out too. Exposure time is also a factor. I want the cycle to be as fast as possible without harm. Iron for the first hatch and lead for the harder to move hatch could MAYBE suffice. We could MAYBE replace the lead with some or all aloys. Osmium could maybe oxidize, in case that’s a problem, but we could coat it. It’s just a suggestion and there could MAYBE be other options. The matarials should thus be non-melting by the exhaust fumes.

We could perhaps use DC electricity for the 3-phase voltage installation’s COAXIAL ROTORS by displacing only one super-electromagnet, while the super-electromagnets (coils around neodymium beams) are SCREWED (MAYBE BIG SCREWS) with MAYBE A DOUBLE HITCH (mastworp in Dutch) for the wires/cables around the neodymium beams. The double hitch (mastworp in Dutch) would be the coil. There are wired/cabled holes in the outer circular shaped pipes. The super-electromagnets (coils around neodymium beams) are covered above by steep Pytagoras triangles, so it’s streamlined. The steep Pytagoras triangles have a circular depth which is being fused at the side. Each super-electromagnet (coil around neodymium) has an enter hole. The super-electromagnets (coils around neodymium beams) don’t float in mid air of course, so again they are screwed to a platform, which is fused (connected) to the side. I mean the beams for sure and maybe the wires/cables. Hollow cylinder (B) is fused to four sideways rods like a x which are fused against the outer circular shaped pipe, while the rods are streamlined too, so they are like an equilaterol triangle. The distance to the super-electromagnets (coils around neodymium beams) and the cylinder shaped neodymium supermagnet should be as short as possible. Hydrocarbons don’t even rust the rotors. We use transformers as well to increase the voltage for the rotors. The regular cylinder (A) fits tightly inside a hollow bigger cylinder (B). The rotating smaller cylinder (A) doesn’t get out of the hollow cylinder (B), due to the fact that it’s partly closed of at the top (bend over), but the bend’s edge should leave enough space to fuse cylinder (A) to cylinder (C). Cylinder C is fused around to the propellor, while cylinder C is above fused to the supermagnetic neodymium cylinder D above the propellor. Hollow cylinder (B) is fused to four sideways rods like a x which are fused against the pipe, while the rods are streamlined too, so they are like an equilaterol triangle. The distance to the super-electromagnets (a coil around neodymium) and the cylinder shaped neodymium supermagnet should be as short as possible.

The following is just the same as here above, but however on the bottom.

Cylinder (A) should beneath be fused to another cylinder (E), while cylinder B prevents cylinder (A) and actually all cylinders from falling down, due to the fact that it’s partly closed of at the bottom (bend over) as well. Cylinder B’s bottom edge should leave enough space to fuse cylinder (A) to Cylinder E. Cylinder E should be fused around to a propellor, so that’s what would make it coaxial, and cylinder E is beneath fused to a supermagnetic neodymium cylinder (F).

The coaxial rotor can also be horizontal or tilted for other applications.

Both supermagnetic cylinder D and supermagnetic cylinder F rotate by two different respective 3-phase voltage instalations. The 3-phase voltage installations are supermagnetic neodymium beams with fastened coils. Motor oil could be wise, while we can hopefully trap the motor oil inside the hollow cylinder B with the trapping edge.

GO TO: Quaving pack

GO TO: Energy infrastructure.

The pipe for flowing to the combustion engine goes beneath the surface of the hydrocarbons, while another outer circular shaped pipe makes it flow back to the container containing hydrocarbons. It flows from higher places to lower places, so we need to sacrifice some energy to make it flow above by COAXIAL ROTORS. Maybe about 5,625 meters in between the end of the bend corner of the pipe and the container. The supermagnetic neodymium cylinder should be at the back of the rotor, so it’s closer to the container. The previous would be the same for multiple rotors, but it doesn’t apply becuase we use coaxial rotors.

The hydrocarbons go back to the reservoir in a pipe after the catalyst and necessary pipe transition with a BEND CORNER OF THE OUTER CIRCUALR SHAPED PIPE AT THE COMBUSTION ENGINE’S EXIT. The reservoir is in the shape of a perpendicualir beam compared to the generator, while the hydrocarbons flow TO THE COMBUSTION ENGINE BY A BEND CORNER FROM THE OUTER CIRCUALR SHAPED PIPE AT THE COMBUSTION ENGINE’S ENTRANCE. Both circular shaped pipes could have a supporting matarial beneath to support them for weight of course and also at the corners. It should be supported high enough though. Both circular shaped pipes could also partly be bend to make them partly flat or with dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley), so it doesn’t move that easily. Dirges are probably better.

The NEW BEST CHOICES: We can perhaps suck the hydrocarbons up. We begin imagining with two straight lines and two straight sideways upwards lines. The sideways part moves to the right. Those two straight lines the above and beneath one go briefly from left to right against the two straight upwards sideways lines (the above and beneath one) at the bottom and from right to left against the straight sideways upwards lines (the above and beneath one) at the top, AS AN OUTER CIRCULAR SHAPED PIPE, which creates a flat corners above and beneath. The pipe is actually circular shaped of course, while being outside the combustion chamber. The coaxial rotor is at the TOP and there is a relatively brief distance between the coaxial rotor and the ABOVE flat straight corners and there’s also a relatively brief distance between the coaxial rotor and the container. This pipe directly starts after the BEND CORNER OF THE CIRCUALR SHAPED PIPE AT THE COMBUSTION ENGINE’S EXIT. This pipe’s drawing is more or less one with the drawing of the bend corner of the outer circular pipe. It would flow upwards for about a meter. That’s what I thought, but it’s however hopefully about 2,2 meters up concerning the surface of the hydrocarbons. Maybe about 5,625 meters in between the end of the bend corner of the pipe and the container. I don’t count the sideways distance. The diameter for flowing upwards is the same as the bend corner. Two coaxial rotors would probably be unnecessary, so not one above and one below at the same time. Not one at the center too either.

We can maybe BLOW the hydrocarbons up. The coaxial rotor is placed at the bottom immediately after the PIPE’S CIRCUALR SHAPED BEND CORNER AT THE COMBUSTION ENGINE’ EXIT and immediately before the pipe GOES up. It starts with two straight lines at the bottom and two straight sideways upwards lines. The sideways part moves to the right. Those two straight lines the above and beneath one go from left to right against the two straight sideways upwards lines the above and beneath one, creating flat corners beneath. These are circular pipes but seen from the side, while being outside the combustion engine. The straight sideways upwards pipe directly leads into the container, so the straight sideways upwards pipe is connected to the container and there’s no flat part for the above of the pipe here. This pipe directly starts after the BEND CORNER OF THE CIRCUALR SHAPED PIPE AT THE COMBUSTION ENGINE’S EXIT. This pipe’s drawing is more or less one with the drawing of the bend corner of the outer circular pipe. Again, It would flow upwards for about a meter. That’s what I thought, but it’s however hopefully about 2,2 meters up concerning the surface of the hydrocarbons Maybe about 5,625 meters in between the end of the bend corner of the pipe and the container. I don’t count the sideways distance. Again, the diameter for flowing upwards is the same as the circular pipe’s bend corner. Two coaxial rotors would probably be unnecessary, so not one below and one in the center too.

The two previous options are better than the curved versions of them.

We can have multiple blowing/sucking coaxial rotors. I know that the coaxial rotors blow and suck at the same time. A rotor (coaxial or not) isn’t necessary before the catalyst.

The coaxial rotors FOR FLOWING THE HYDROCARBONS UP are connected somewhere on the generator with wires/cables. I guess that there should be non-conducting tubes inside the generator from the start of the generator to the end into the wires/cables. The wires/cables can perhaps be specially fused to the generator, so we melt and solidy a certain matarial (I guess the matarial of the generator) around the wire/cable. We can also use wall outlets but probably with one pole. The power plug is more stable with two holes, but the power plug leads into one wire/cable afterward, SO WE USE 3 HOLES OR EVEN SIX HOLES AS WALL OUTLET FOR THE COAXIAL ROTOR. We can also fuse a block with a hole to the generator, while we drill through the block into the cable, because the cable goes through the block’s hole. The cable can be isolated with vinyl as example. The coaxial rotor could maybe break when the propeller is too strong. When the mechanics are like the quaving packs, so the cylinder thing would then be sturdy. Using garmen to conduct (accelerating electrons) is probably better when you combine it with an oxidizing agent, while garmen helps to save energy like how it was written before on the page below too. I hope that garmen is a solid. We could partially isolate it with vinyl to prevent the schocking of employees. There could be a transistion inside the vinyl (if garmen is powder like or liquid and maybe a gas), so it starts with copper AS EXAMPLE, while it later changes to garmen (or maybe no transition). We can perhaps charge more effectively with those non-conducting tubes. Those tubes are squared where they can be sqaured. They would otherwise be a different shape. I guess that the generator should MAYBE be build by the non-conducting tubes probably by fusing the tubes. We could also make the generator of solid garmen between the tubes, but the start and end of the container should maybe be made of copper as example, in case garmen is powder like or liquid and maybe a gas. It would have to be shielded at the sides too including above I guess.

I pray that the wire/cables don’t get too hot!!!!

GO TO: Quaving pack

GO TO: Fast/strong compact batteries

If the propellers are like the quaving packs than the motor oil would help for smoother movement, while I hope that we don’t need to refresh the motor oil, so the motor oil could maybe be trapped inside.

GO TO: Energy infrastructure.

A SUPPORTING PLATFORM UNDERNEATH FOR WEIGHT IS MAYBE UNNECESSARY. The supporting platform for weight should unless be sideways here. With an optional dirge (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley)

The hexagons are about the size like above but probably but quite a bit bigger. The catalyst probably only works with hexagons and hydrocarbons with exhaust fumes. The catalyst thus has a hexagon structure. We first coat a plate with the catalytic layer, and we then properly fuse them into hexagons. We then fuse the hexagons together into a honeycomb LIKE structure. Teamwork creates miracles, so we use a giant group. WE HAVE TO FIGURE OUT THE RIGHT SIZE OF THE HEXAGONS. I assume that tilted squares (instead of hexagons) won’t suffice, but I MIGHT be wrong. Again, it can’t go on for an eternity when the cycle isn’t perfect. I DOUBT THAT INCREDIBLY GIANT COMBUSTION ENGINES WILL FUNCTION WITH INCREDIBLY GIANT HEXAGONS, so I guess that they would remain about the regular size.

AGAIN, I suppose that there is a temperature where the given heat eguals the taken heat, so I pray that we can find the right matarials, including the harder to move second hatch. The SAME for the easier to move first hatch and especially for the easier to move thing which only moves up and down (with the new extra part). The matarial should melt to fuse, so I hope that we can find a meltable matarial with a high enough melt temperature for the cycle, while being able to fuse or we should GALVANIZE the hexagons, in case that’s possible. On the other hand, the temperature maybe doesn’t increase anymore after a certain point, becuase I suppose that there is a temperature where the taken heat equals the given heat. We would have to figure this one out too. Exposure time is also a factor. I want the cycle to be as fast as possible without harm. Again, Iron (iron for the first hatch) and lead (lead for the second harder to move hatch) could maybe suffice. The thing which only moves up and down (with the new extra part attached) should probably be made of carbon fiber. Like probably most of the combustion engine. We could maybe replace the lead with some other metal or some aloys. Osmium maybe oxidizes, in case that’s a problem, but we could coat it. Osmium could be too heavy too though. It’s just a suggestion and there could MAYBE be other options.

We don’t turn the hexagon structure 0,5π radians due to thermal. The real catalyst is made out of more hexagons. The gold inside the hexagons inhibits at the entrance, so we should maybe make a gold streamlined part at the entrance, so they enter smoother. The streamlined gold part should also cover the resin too where they enter the hexagons (the entrance).

The corners of the hexagons maybe need special shaped golden bricks, just in case. It’s however probably unnecessary. These are actually hexagon shaped pipes. THE CATALYST DOESN’T WORK WHEN IT’S TOO SHORT. IT’S RELATIVELY INCREDIBLY LONG (maybe AT LEAST 2,2 meters LONG), so the surface is better of big too (a sort of diameter of about 1,6 meters (the hexagon structure should fit tightly inside a sqaure). There is a ratio between length and surface area. Try it with a flamethrower in case that’s hot enough. It would be without sucking though. We can touch the hot edges of the catalyst to notice that it works, but not with bare hands or hands at all. The hexagon edges shouldn’t melt, but we can test it that way. The length of both catalysts are a factor too.

Bigger combustion engines and bigger generators need a bigger catalyst.

The other part is that we have to use a negative catalyst to prevent them from burning immediately (burning at the wrong place). After the golden catalyst, which means the hexagons must be the SAME SIZE. SIMPLY COOLING IT WITH A COOLANT DOESN’T SUFFICE, BECUASE IT BURNS AT THE WRONG PLACE BEFORE IT COOLS DOWN.

(!!!!!!!!!!)

We can maybe ELECTRICALLY galvanize mercury (liquid metal at room temperature) to the inside of the hexagons pipes, while we solvate the nicotine inside the mercury (The solvation should probably happen before the galvanization, maybe mingling it with warmth). The mercury should be saturated with nicotine or maybe not entirely to make it stay. Hoping that the mercury doesn’t flow away by the hydrocarbons by being strongly galvanized. Hoping that the nicotine stays as well. This part is inspired by the Pokémon Meltan. We should maybe mix the nicotine with an adhesive, but I have more faith in mercury. We should maybe take the thickness of the mercury layer into acount too.

Bigger combustion engines and bigger generators need a bigger catalyst. The length of both catalysts must get bigger when the total surface area of the hexagons get’s bigger of course.

It’s probably already known, but I assume that the hydrocarbons must cool to room temperature to prevent the overheating of the combustion engine. I assume that the gold NEVER melts, but I don’t know the effect of temperature on the nicotine. We should also prevent the overheating of anything else, like the edges of the hexagons. We don’t want to burn the content of the container too.

It could possibly be due to the certain structured surface of the the golden catalyst to rearrange atoms, while the nicotine perhaps binds with the hydrocarbons and oxygen, while it drains their chemical energy before both molecules get detached. The Grotentraast gold clicks them (CO2 & H20) together like some sort of puzzle pieces, similar to an explanation of an old chemisty teacher, but I didn’t have much lessons. This would strangely enough mean that the sun’s core perhaps isn’t molten, in case the catalyst theory is true. I suppose that the gold’s electrons somehow remain in their excited state too. The palladium could perhaps increase the pressure of the water, or only the hydrogen, which is probably necessary to form the hydrocarbons. Palladium is known for it’s strength to solvate much hydrogen. GETTING THE ALLOY RIGHT IS ALSO VERY IMPORTAND, because it can determine if the entire plan succeeds or not.

The rest here is really late:

(!!!!!!)

The honeycomb LIKE structure refers to the picture above.

WE JUST FUSE STUFF TO THE HONEYCOMB LIKE CATALYST AS COVERING FILLING MATARIAL, UNTIL IT BECOMES CIRCULAR OR SQAURE SHAPED.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

I call the transistion from the square shaped pipe to the circular shaped pipe simply pipe transistion. The regular circular pipes can probaby be made by fusing it bit by bit.

There can either be square shaped pipes inside the combuation engine or circular shaped pipes outside the combustion engine. I meant a sqaure shaped pipe/deep hole hole.

The transition from a sqaure shaped pipe to a circular shaped pipe looks like this: The sqaure shaped pipe contains the hexagon structure which tighly fits inside the sqaure shaped pipe before the necessary pipe transition. The circular shaped pipe could start as a sqaure shaped one one by having covering filling matarial in the corners like on the picture by filling the gap. We thus just keep fusing stuff to the circular pipe until the whole becomes sqaure shaped and we fuse that to the rest of the combustion engine. The circular pipe thus isn’t perfectly circular at the middle of the four sides of the sqaure. This necessary pipe transition block should however probably have a proper depth inside the square pipe. SO WE PUT THE BLOCK CONTAINING THE CIRCULAR SHAPED PIPE WITHIN THE COMBUSTION ENGINE AND BUILD AROUND IT. THE COMBUSTION ENGINE HAS A CIRCUALR SHAPED PIPE WITH A BEND CORNER AT THE EXIT. We could use a dense blade to cut for short identical slices. We can optionally cut and fuse slices of the block containing the circular pipe. Or we build and fuse short slices. I’m more secure that we don’t need two coaxial rotors this way. I’m more secure that it works in the first place. The diameter would be 1,6 (I guess).

I call the transistion from the catalyst block to pipe transistion block simply pipe transistion.

WE CAN MAKE THE BEND CORNER OF THE CIRCULAR PIPE DIRECTLY AFTER THE PIPE TRANSISTION. THE PIPE TRANSISTION FITS TIGHTLY INSIDE THE SQAURE SHAPED DEEP HOLE/PIPE. WE CAN END THE CATALYST BEFORE THE SQAURED PIPE TURNS INTO THE PIP TRANSISTION.

THE PIPE TRANSITION BLOCK SHOULD HAVE THE SAME SQAURE SIZE AS THE CATALYST, and should be fused to eachother.

There can either be square shaped pipes inside the combuation engine or circular shaped pipes outside the combustion engine. I meant a sqaure shaped holes as sqaure shaped pipe.

We tightly fuse the circular shaped pipe around and against the combustion engine’s sqaure shaped entrance. The sqaure shaped entrance leads into a deep sqaure shaped hole/pipe. The transition from the circular pipe to the sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe looks like the picture on the left. The sqaure shaped entrance has the combustion engine’s wall around it. I guess that we normally fuse the incomming pipe bit by bit, while we fuse the circular pipe against the combustion engine, so we fuse the circular shaped pipe tightly around and against the sqaure shaped entrance. Again, the sqaure shaped entrance has the combustion engine’s wall around it. The sqaure shaped deep hole leads on to the sqaure shaped first hatch at the end of the sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe and the first sqaure shaped hatch leads into the combustion chamber. THE COMBUSTION ENGINE HAS A CIRCUALR PIPE WITH A BEND CORNER AT THE ENTRANCE. We fuse my hinge above the end of the square shaped deep hole/the end of the square shaped pipe. The sqaure shaped edge HERE (sqaure shaped thick circumference/door porter) at the end of the sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe should be magnetic. I guess that the magnetism doesn’t bother the process which I think is called diffusion. The hatch is square shaped and tightly fused to my hinge. I guess that the first hatch is better of being sqaure shaped.

Bypassing the square shaped pipes makes the hydrocarbons return more slowly.

GO TO: Quaving pack (for the hinge)

!!!!!

This plan seemed the best.

There can either be square shaped pipes inside the combuation engine or circular shaped pipes outside the combustion engine. I meant a sqaure shaped deep hole for the sqaured pipe. The pipe transition would be a circular shaped hole, like I wrote above before.

We can start by making a deep sqaure shaped hole optionally by cutting or by préventif fusing with optionally corrective carving. Then we could shove a block containing the catalyst and the optional pipe transition block into the combustion engine by pushing or rolling with a machine. The rolling is done by getting a machine with a platform or rods underneath, while rolling with a wall on the back. The machine with the rods/platform should have handles too of course. It’s best when the rods/platform of the rolling machine and the back’s wall are above the wheels. The rolling machine can be combined with a lubricant. The rods or platform of the rolling machine should then be thin. The sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe is inside the combustion engine for leading into the pipe transistion. Imagine a tight square around the honeycomb LIKE structure. The square shaped deep hole/pipe leads into the first sqaure shaped hatch and another sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe is after the second almost square shaped hatch. Some strong covering filling matarial should enterily close the gap of the square shaped pipe. The covering filling matarial ends at the combustion engine’s exit. High weight is no bother as long as the underneath can take it which should be high enough. The covering filling material is here to surround the honeycomb LIKE structure catalyst, so it closes the gap of the sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe entirely. Again, the honeycomb LIKE structure should fit tightly inside the sqaure pipe before it ends at the pipe transistion or directly at the combustion engine’s exit by a pipe which is fused around the honeycomb lIKE hole and against the combustion engine. The pipe transistion also fits tightly inside the square pipe. The matarials should also be non-melting by the exhaust fumes.

Again, we can also fuse a circular pipe around the honeycomb LIKE hole against the combustion engine. We could fuse the pipe tightly around the honeycomb LIKE hole, or we fuse the outer circular pipe tightly against the pipe transistion.

We can support the pipes beneath at a flat part of the pipes against rolling, but supporting with dirges is probably better (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round). It would be supported high enough. There could be a flat side and the flat side should then be wide enough. We can perhaps also make dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round). Instead of bending it flat. It would be supported high enough.

WE CAN ACTAULLY MAKE THE BEND CORNER OF THE CIRCULAR PIPE (including the empty relatively short straight part) DIRECTLY AFTER THE CATALYST OR ALMOST AFTER THE CATALSYT (pipe transition block). THE CATALYST COULD ENTIRELY FIT INSIDE THE SQAURE PIPE. WE CAN END THE CATALYST AND COVERING FILLING MATARIAL BRIEFLY BEFORE THE SQUARE SHAPED PIPE TURNS INTO A CIRCULAR DEEP HOLE OR A CIRCULAR SHAPED OUTER PIPE. The bend corner (including the empty relatively short straight part) of the pipe should have the right shape, so it directly bends around the corner (including the empty relatively short straight part) after the combustion engine’s exit.

It ends here.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

This is the best:

There can either be square shaped deep holes/pipes inside the combuation engine or circular shaped pipes outside the combustion engine. The pipe transition is however a circular shaped hole.

We can put a catalyst in a block with the pipe transistion block onto the wall of the combustion engine when the combustion engine isn’t done yet and finish the engine afterward. The block containing the catalyst and the necessary pipe transition block are fused to the rest of the combustion engine afterward, while leaving empty sqaure shaped space before the catalyst. WE CAN ACTAULLY MAKE THE BEND CORNER OF THE PIPE (including the relatively short straight part) DIRECTLY AFTER THE NECESSARY PIPE TRANSISTION. THE CATALSYT COULD ENTIRELY FIT INSIDE THE SQAURE SHAPED DEEP HOLE/PIPE WITH THE COVERING FILLING MATARIAL. WE CAN THUS END THE CATALYST WITH THE CATALYST’S COVERING FILLING MATARIAL WHEN THE TRANSITION FROM THE DEEP HEXAGON STRUCTURE TO THE PIPE TRANSISTON OCCURS. THE PIPE GOES AROUND THE CORNER AT THE EXIT OF THE COMBUSTION ENGINE (including the relatively short straight part of the bend corner), so the outer circular pipe with a bend corner is fused against the pipe transistion at the combustion engine’s exit.

We can support the pipes beneath at a flat part of the pipes against rolling, but supporting with dirges is probably better (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley). It would be supported high enough. There could be a flat side and the flat side should then be wide enough. We can perhaps also make dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round). Instead of bending it flat. It would be supported high enough.

It ends here:

We can maybe adjust the container’s position and perhaps the generator’s position too (to replace the generator) with multiple smaller steamrollers or a giant one. We could combine it with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) for the first part.

HERE ARE SOME MORE PRIMARY OPTIONS:

!!!!!!!!!!!

THE LIFTNG PLATFORMS AND ELEVATORS WITH OPTIONALY TWO OPEN SIDES. SEEMS LIKE THE BEST CHOICE TO ME:

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

There’s no building order, concerning the combustion engine with the container and the weight supporting platform. We place and maybe afterward (not before) fuse the circular outward pipes (including the content of the pipes) after the weight supporting platforms. The pipes can be pushed/rolled after the weight supporting platform is done, except the bend corner of the pipe.

THE LIFTING CAN PERHAPS BE DONE LIKE AN ELEVATOR. THE ELEVATOR. WOULD HAVE AN OPEN SIDE OR MAYBE TWO AS EXAMPLE OR A LIFTING PLATFORM LIKE THE ONE FOR CLEANING SKYCRAPERS BUT: Bigger, stronger, and more sturdy. I hope that we can be fastened to the elevator’s ceiling, in case we fall OR strongly being attached to a strong cable which goes from one wall from the elevator to the adjacent wall, while strongly being attached to that cable by another cable, while the cable is detachable, in case we fall with a safety net. We can also make a strong cable between the two poles one the lifting platform (which is normally meant for cleaning skyscrapers), while strongly being attached to that cable by another cable, while the cable is detachable, in case we fall with a safety net. The lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) and stack of platforms as example should all be removed in the end. The container should be metalic (or made of carbon fiber as example), due to the holes, because it could collapse when the wall is made of bricks, and most of all bricks don’t fuse, but we however somehow can let the pipes go through the brick holes, so the pipes would go tightly through the holes which maybe prevents collapsing of the bricks. We can maybe push the pipe partly into the container and balance it onto the thick enough brick wall, while fusing the rest of the pipe afterward at the combustion engine. We maybe can either fuse the container layer for layer or plate by plate. The top can be closed by fusing plates which don’t fall into the container without standing out. The floor could remain the same OR we build the floor to shove it with a steam roller. We could build around the hole or cut the hole, while fusing errors back.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

The lifting platforms and elevators with optionaly two open sides, could have dirges (like the sides of a bowling ally). It’s more similar to a bowling alley’s side, because we need to roll it out of the the dirge (like the sides of a bowling alley).

This could be important for lifting:

The catalyst block and optional pipe transition block with the rest could be build on the lifting platform or the lifting platform should go a bit down the regular floor, while pushing with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch).

OR WE SHOULD LIFT AND ROLL THE CATALYST AND SUCH (everything including the optional pipe transition) WITH RODS OR A PLATFORM OR SOMETHING. We could optionally use a real leverage, while sliding the catalyst and such (including the optional pipe transition), so we slide it on the lifting platform with maybe a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch). The rolling machine should have rods or a platform underneath the object, which needs to be rolled, while rolling. The rolling machine has a wall as back. The machine with the rods/platform should have handles. It’s best when the rods/platform of the rolling machine and the wall at the back are above the wheels. We could also just roll it up on a sideways path in height (a little similar to a hill). We can also slice or make short slices of the catalsyt and pipe transition and carry it with human hands.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

Again, the lifting platforms and elevators with optionaly two open sides could have dirges (like the sides of a bowling ally), so the pipes can roll out of the dirge (like the sides of a bowling ally). It’s more similar to a bowling alley’s side, because we need to roll it outside the dirge (like the sides of a bowling alley).

It ends here.

!!!!!!!!!!!

THIS SEEMED LESS GREAT THAN THE LIFTING PLATFORMS, BUT THAT CAN’T GO WITHOUT THIS AND WE NEED THIS TOO. THERE MAYBE IS ANOTHER WAY TOO.

We can also make a stack of: BIG, STURDY, and STRONG platforms where an upwards sideways stair/ladder (Dutch word) goes to the next platform above. We would go upwards to the right and to the left in turns with stairs, or ladders. We can also go downward of course. We could use the previous to build the lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) and elevators with optionaly two open sides. There’s no building order for the weight supporting platform, concerning the building of the combustion engine with the container. We place and maybe afterward (not before) fuse the outer circular pipes after the building of the weight supporting platform. The dirge of the weight supporting platform is a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round. Maybe by fusing the pipe bit by bit and building the weight supporting platform brick by brick. Or the weight supporting platform could be metalic too as example. We can make lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides by using the stack of platforms and we MIGHT use ladders for the job, which can optionally be shoved. We could use lifting platforms (like the ones for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides to be able to roll the biggest part of the pipes. Some stack of platforms or lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or the elevator with optionaly two open sides, should already be removed like the ones at the container’s holes to build the weight supporting platform and the pipes afterward by moving horizontal in both ways, but we can also build the weight supporting platform before the rest. By building it from the sides. The container and combustion engine would then be build at the backs of the weight supporting platform. We also build the pipes after the weight supporting platform. The stacks of platforms and eventually all such get’s removed. Moving horizontal in both ways may come in handy. It’s probably better than changing stairs or ladders (Dutch word) all the time for different hights and it’s especially easier to carry things than with the ladder (dutch word). It’s also especially safe to create the above part of the elevator with optionaly two open sides and the lifitng platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers). The stairs and ladders (Dutch word) could have railings and maybe a climbing wall like cable for the ladders, but I guess that the stairs would have to be kinda steep for the cable. The ladder would need to be prevented from staggering in a certain way. We can probably make the climbing wall like cable by using the stack of platforms or ladders which we can shove to get higher. Again there are also ladders (Dutch word) which can be shoved to adjust the height. The stack of platforms could have wheels underneath, so we would only need ONE STACK OF PLATFORMS, while people could hold it still. The people could then hold the wheels beneath as extra safety, while there could be safety nets to the side. Hoping that we fall far enough, SO THERE CAN HOPEFULLY BE A SAFETY NET FOR THIS TOO. OR WE CAN MAYBE SOMEHOW MECHANICALLY STOP THE WHEELS FROM ROLLING. It might be like a car (foot) brake or like a motor (hand brake) or something else. I guess that the previous is stronger than just holding it, in case it works. We maybe can also use BIG ENOUGH wheels which withdraw like an airplane as example, so the stack of platforms would then rest on something else. The stack of platforms would fall a little when the BIG ENOUGH wheels get withdrawn, so we would withdraw slowly. We can also make elevators and lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) by leaving or making a hole in the roof and ceiling or maybe with multiple holes. THERE MAYBE IS ANOTHER WAY TOO.

3 We can also attach strong cables with a knot as example and roll the cables up above.

I assume that it’s already known but we could use a giant grapping machine for the pipes, which somehow works like putting your hands together into eachother, but the matarial would have to be light weight like plastic. Plastic could however be a problem for the rotor. We would need the right kind of plastic. The same accounts for other grapping machines. THERE MAYBE IS ANOTHER WAY TOO.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

Again, the lifting platforms could have dirges (like the sides of a bowling ally). It’s more similar to a bowling alley, because the pipes need to roll out of the dirge (like the side of a bowling alley).

WE CAN MAYBE FORGET ABOUT THE CABLES AND ONLY USE A SAFETY NET BY KNOTTING THE SAFETY NET TO THE POLES OR CABLE IT TO POLES, BUT THE FALL COULD MAYBE BE TOO HIGH. WE COULD BUILD MULTIPLE SAFETY NET LAYERS THOUGH, BUT WE MAYBE STILL FALL TOO HARD.

WE WOULD MAYBE MAKE MULTIPLE SAFETY NET LAYERS BY USING THE SAME POLES, SO THE SAME POLE COULD HAVE MULTIPLE SAFETY NET LAYERS. I THUS ASSUME THAT WE WOULDN’T NEED MULTIPLE POLES.

Again, we can maybe adjust the container’s position and perhaps the generator’s position (to replace the generator) with multiple smaller steamrollers or a giant one. We could combine it with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) for the first part.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

IT DOESN’T WORK WHEN THE MEASUREMENTS AREN’T PERFECT. The combustion engine and container need to be giant as you may know. There should be a relative bit of space between the top of the second hatch and the combustion chamber’s ceiling. That distance is to make it blow/suck stronger outside the combustion engine. The first hatch with the hinges are directly beneath the combustion chamber’s ceiling. There should be a certain ratio between the combustion engine and the catalyst and all. Especially for the sqaure space before the catalyst.

WE SHOULD PROBABLY DETERMINE THE MEAUSUEREMENTS WITH TRIAL AND ERROR.

It ends here.

I of course mean pushing or rolling with shoving, just saying. The pushing/rolling is maybe mainly done by humans. I don’t know if a machine could help, so I meant humans and stopped noting that it’s done by machines eventually.

The weight supportng platform can perhaps be fused with a certian matarial like certian metals or carbon fiber AS EXAMPLE, or we do it brick by brick with cement (Dutch word), while the straight upwards sideways weight supporting platform could be build like a suiting pyramid without stairs with cement (Dutch word), but we forget about the sides of the pyramid. The pipes can be supported high enough of course. I assume that the dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round) would be carved (including certian metals) or fused in a préventif way.

WE MAYBE DON’T NEED THE UNDERNEATH SUPPORT FOR WEIGHT BY FUSING. THE PIPES SHOULLD HOWEVER THAN BE THICK ENOUGH.

(!!!!!!!!!)

WE COULD PUT THE CATALYST INSIDE A BLOCK INTO THE UNFINSHED COMBUSTION ENGINE AND FINISH THE ENGINE AFTERWARD (The same for the optional pipe transition block), SO THE BLOCKS GET FUSED TO THE REST OF THE COMBUSTION ENGINE. WE FUSE THE CIRCULAR PIPES WITH THE BEND CORNER TOO. WE SHOULD MAYBE PUSH/ROLL THE BLOCKS CONTAINING THE CATALYST AND THE OPTIONAL PIPE TRANSITION WITH A LUBRICANT (glijmiddel in Dutch) into the combustion engine and build further afterward. The rolling is done by getting a machine with a platform or rods underneath, while rolling with a wall on the back. The machine with the rods/platform should have handles too of course. It’s best when the rods/platform of the rolling machine and the back’s wall are above the wheels. The rolling machine can be combined with a lubricant. The pushing can perhaps be by human hands, in case there’s no machine for it. We maybe don’t need the pushing/rolling with an optional lubricant (glijmidel in Dutch), BECUASE WE CAN MAKE MULTIPLE SHORT SLICES OF THE CATALYST AND OPTIONAL PIPE TRANSITION WITH THE COVERING FILLING MATARIAL, EITHER SLICING OR BUILDING THEM SHORT. HUMANS COULD THEN LIFT THE SLICES TOGETHER. I of course mean pushing or rolling with shoving, just saying. The pushing is mainly done by humans. I don’t know if machines could help. The matarial should somehow get above of course. Either with lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or an elevator with optionaly two open sides and also the stack of platforms.

(!!!!!!!!!!!!)

THERE ARE STILL MORE DIFFERENT KIND OF NEEDED OPTIONS BELOW.

The first 3 primary:

(!!!!!!!!!!!!)

The biggest problem is lifting EVERYTHING including: the catalyst block with the pipe transition block and all of the pipes up high enough. Maybe with an elevator with optionaly two open sides, while pushing strong enough. Lifting could also be done with lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers), while pushing strong enough. Both the elevator with two open sides and the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) adjust the height. We maybe use machines for pushing or we do it by human hands with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch). We can also get the building matarial above with the stack of platfroms.

We can perhaps lift (with a platform like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or an elevator with two open sides) and roll all building matarial with a machine, instead of pushing with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch). We can thus also roll the catalyst and optional pipe transition by putting the machine’s rods/platform underneath and roll forward with a wall at the back. The machine with the rods/platform should have handles. It’s best when the rods/platform of the rolling machine and the wall at the back are above the wheels. We should fuse the pipes when being above, while being fastened with a safety net, in case we fall (see way above). We just place and fuse the bend corners of the pipe. A lubricant with human hands (glijmiddel in Dutch) is maybe not that bad in the end though. We can also get the building matarial above with the stack of platfroms.

The weight supporting platforms have dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so they are more round) The height of the weight supporting matarial underneath should be high enough with dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round) There’s no building order, concerning the combustion engine with the container and the weight supporting platform. We place and maybe afterward (not before) fuse the circular outward pipes (including the content of the pipes) after the weight supporting platforms. The pipes can be pushed/rolled after the weight supporting platform is done, except the bend corner of the pipe.

The weight supporting platform with a dirge (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round) doesn’t have a build order concerning the ENTIRE combustion engine and container. The container and combustion engine would be build at the backs of the weight supporting platform when we build the weight supporting platform before. The height of the weight supporting matarial underneath should be high enough with dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round) before we fuse the pipes. The pipes are normally fused bit by bit. The fusing should happen when being above with lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides. We normally fuse the pipes bit by bit. Rolling the pipes of the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or rolling it of the elevator with optionaly two open sides would of course be the best for circular pipes. Again, the lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides should have dirges (like the sides of a bowling alley). It’s more similar to a bowling alley’s side, because we need to roll it out of the the dirge (like the sides of a bowling alley). The straight sideways upwards pipe would then fall a little, because the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevator with optionally two open sides would be higher. The pipe’s bend corner at the combustion engine’s exit doesn’t roll that well, so the corner should be placed and fused separate. We thus use lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides. We should maybe separately fuse the corner of the pipe which makes the hydrocarbons flow back to the container before the upwards straight sideways part falls down when the corner isn’t deep enough. We perhaps don’t have to when it’s deep enough. We otherwise just place and fuse the bend corner of the pipe. The other pipe isn’t that bothered by falling. We fuse when being above. We can also get the building matarial above with the stack of platfroms. A lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) with human hands is maybe not that bad in the end.

We can start with building the weight supporting platform with the pipes (incuding the content) and then the container and the ENTIRE combustion engine afterward. The container and combustion engine should be build at the backs of the weight supporting platform. The pipes can partialy be pushed/rolled on the weight supporting plarform with the lifting platform and/or elevator with optionaly two open sides. The pipe’s bend corner doesn’t roll that well, so we fuse that separately.

We should however first push a block containing the honeycomb LIKE shaped catalyst into the combustion engine, while we also push an optional pipe transition block into the combustion engine.

Again, the weight supporting platform should have dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round).

EVERYTHING should regularly be builed from the bottom to the top.

THIS IS THE BEST PLAN:

We can optionaly start by building a floor then we start by making 3 walls shaped like a sqaure with one missing wall, while 2 OR 3 OF THEM could be THICK by optionaly using an elevator with optionaly two open sides and optionaly a lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) for the building matarial. Then we fuse an ENTIRE thick enough sqaure shaped edge against the 3 walls by optionaly using an elevator with optionaly two open sides and optionaly a lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers). Then we fuse the fourth wall against the ENTIRE sqaure shaped edge by optionaly using an elevator with optionaly two open sides and optionaly a lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers), which is partial open (The fourth wall is partial open), WHILE THE FOURTH WALL SHOULD NOT BE TOO THICK, DUE TO THE WEIGHT. The partial open wall should thus be THICK ENOUGH BUT NOT TOO THICK. We can also build the walls with the stack of platforms and wheels would be of use to carry building matarial. The previous is safer than using ladders which can be shoved. Then we would use a big enough lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or however probably a big enough elevator with optionaly two open sides to shove a plate over the entire sqaure shaped platform which has a sqaure shaped hole, so the plate does rest on the edge. The shoving can be done with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch). The rolling machine (more above and below) will fall, even when we spread the wheels over the carrying rods/platform. The rolling machine can turn out by pushing afterward, but that’s ridiculous. The plate will become the original thing which moves up and down. We could also shove multiple beams and multiple plates together, while they are molten at the sides, while being placed tightly next to eachother, but placing an entire plate is better. The shoving can be done with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch). We can also stack plates on eachother, while the bottom is molten underneath at the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or molten underneath at the elevator with optionaly two open sides. The lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or the elevator with optionally two open sides would have a higher melt temperature than the plates, while a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) wouldn’t work of course. Stacking the entire plate is better than stacking multiple beams or multiple plates. We could also stand on the plate and fuse it bit by bit. We then have to build from top to bottom, so we would use the stack of platforms with optional wheels to build the new extra part of the thing which only moves up and down, so I mean the fused smaller block of the thing which only moves up and down, which fits/goes through the square shaped hole. We also use the stack of platforms to build the rods and axises (cylinder things) and also the crankshaft. The rods also fit/go through the sqaure hole and the axises with the crankshaft might also go/fit through the square hole (depending on the length). We could then finish the walls by either lifting ourselves with building matarial or by using the stack of platforms to carry the building matarial, while leaving sqaure shaped deep holes/pipes which need THICK walls. We can place the catalyst block and the optional pipe transition block on the THICK walls before the sqaure shaped deep hole/pipe is done, and we also leave empty sqaure shaped space before the catalyst. We probably place it from the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or an elevator with optionaly two open sides by shoving it with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) or rolling it with a rolling machine. More about the rolling machine above and below. The other two sides get longer when the two sides of the pipes/holes get thicker and vice versa. We of course fuse the circular pipes with the bend corners afterward, against the combustion engine’s sides and also against the container’s side. We can also do the hatches when the sqaure shaped deep holes/pipes are done by lifting platfroms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or by elevators with optioanly two open sides. We of course fuse the circular pipes with the bend corners afterward, against the combustion engine’s sides and also against the container’s side. We can close the ceiling of afterward. The lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) and the elevator with optionaly two open sides wouldn’t have a dirge (like the sides of a bowling alley) when we don’t lift pipes. We could also use ONE lifting platform when they move in both horizonal ways. The same for the elevator but rotating could be pushing. I wrote about supermagnetic parts way above: I also wrote about how the rods are fused way above: The pipe has content too, so the pipe parts should be small enough by a cross section, so we can reach and build with our hands. The other plan is to fuse pieces together into a pipe with build in fitting content.

Again, the generator is inside the gap of the combustion engine. ONLY SLIGHTLY PARTIAl THOUGH, so it’s close to the crankshaft. I HOPE SO, OR IT PERHAPS WORKS AT A LARGER DISTANCE.

We should be fastened when being above with a safety net, in case we fall (see way above).

The hydrocarbons should of course be pumped inside the container at the start.

The end of the 3 primary suggestions.

THERE ARE EVEN MORE NEEDED DIFFERENT OPTIONS BELOW:

!!!!!

Pushing with a lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) might afterall be best for fusing the catalyst block and optional pipe transition block into the combustion engine. Pushing maybe doesn’t have to be that hard for relatively small block slices with the catalyst and optional pipe transition within. THOSE SLICES CAN BE LIFTED BY HUMANS OR MACHINES.

The fusing could happen when being above with lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides. We can get the matarial up with a stack of platforms too. The weight supporting part optionaly with a dirge (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round) We normally fuse the pipes bit by bit. Rolling would of course be the best for circular pipes. The pipe’s corner at the combustion engine’s exit doesn’t roll that well, so the corner should be placed and fused separate. The straight sideways upwards part would then fall a little, because the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevator with optionaly two open sides would be higher. We thus use lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides. We should maybe separately fuse the corner of the pipe which makes the hydrocarbons flow back to the container before the upwards straight sideways part falls down when the corner isn’t deep enough. We perhaps don’t have to when it’s deep enough. We otherwise just place and fuse the bend corner of the pipe. The other pipe isn’t that bothered by falling. We fuse when being above. A lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) with human hands is maybe not that bad in the end.

There’s no building order, concerning the combustion engine and container the pipes can be fused before the weight supporting platform or afterward. We afterward place the pipes on the weight supporting platfroms of course. Again, the pipes can partialy be pushed/rolled on the weight supporting plarform with the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) and/or the elevator with optionaly two open sides. The pipe’s bend corner doesn’t roll that well. There should be content inside the pipe.

Again, we should first push a block containing the honeycomb LIKE shaped catalyst into the combustion engine, while we also push an optional pipe transition block into the combustion engine.

The weight supporting platform should have dirges (like the sides of a bowling alley). It’s more similar to a bowling alley’s side, because we need to roll it out of the the dirge (like the sides of a bowling alley).

Again, the lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides could have dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling ally, so it’s more round).

We should be fastened when being above with a safety net, in case we fall (see way above).

The hydrocarbons should of course be pumped inside the container at the start.

I MAYBE EXAGGERATE THE HIGHT OF THE COMBUSTION ENIGINE IN THE END, WHEN IT COMES TO THE MEASURES, SO WE WOULDN’T NEED LIFTING PLATFORMS IN THAT CASE, BUT ROLLING THE PIPES COMES IN HANDY. ON THE OTHER HAND: THE CEILING DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THAT HIGH. I PROBABLY EXAGGERATE THE HIGHT OF THE COMBUSTION ENIGINE IN THE END, SO WE WOULDN’T NEED LIFTING PLATFORMS IN THAT CASE, BUT ROLLING THE PIPES COMES IN HANDY. ON THE OTHER HAND: THE CEILING DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THAT HIGH.

The end

!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This seemed like be best, but we maybe still do it:

The rods/platform of the the machine for shoving should of course be strong and short enough, so the rods/platform wouldn’t move down by the weight. It’s best when the rods/platform of the rolling machine and the wall at the back are above the wheels.

The rods/platform shouldn’t melt or fuse, so we could technically use golden rods or a golden platform underneath the catalsyt and pipe transition as example. We melt the: TOP, BOTTOM, AND BOTH SIDES of the combustion engine’s sqaure shaped space before we shove the block containing the catalyst, and the optional block containing the pipe transition inside when being above the wall (more above). The rods/platform should then be as thin as possible. Hoping that the maracta tree resin is strong enough or it should entirely be golden. WE CAN ALSO BUILD AROUND THE CATALYST BLOCK AND AROUND THE PIPE TRANSISTION BLOCK AS WELL. The rods/platform should then be as thin as possible. Hoping that the maracta tree resin is strong enough or it should entirely be golden.

We also don’t need gold when the to be fused part of the block with the catalyst inside doesn’t touch the rods/platform for shoving, while still being strong enough. WE CAN AFTERALL HAVE A MELT TEMPERATURE DIFFRENCES FOR THE RODS/PLATFORM. We make the underneath weight supporting matarial with dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round). We make the underneath weight supporting matarial after the catalyst and container.

Both pipes would be supported high enough by weight supporting platforms beneath with dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it more round).

Again, there’s no building order for the weight supporting platfrom optionaly with dirge (a bit like the sides of a bowling alley, so it’s more round). Concerning the build of the combustion engine and the container. We normally fuse the pipes bit by bit. The pipes can be pushed/rolled after the weight supporting platform is done. Rolling would of course be the best for circular pipes. The pipe’s corner at the combustion engine’s exit doesn’t roll that well, so the corner should be placed and fused separate. The straight sideways upwards part would then fall a little, because the lifting platform (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevator with two open sides would be higher. I guess that the stack of platforms also wouldn’t be ideal. The stack of platforms would have straight sideways upwards paths instead of ladders and stairs. We can also use lifting platforms (like the one for cleaning skyscrapers) or elevators with optionaly two open sides and optioanly the different stack of platforms too. We should maybe separately fuse the corner of the pipe which makes the hydrocarbons flow back to the container before the upwards straight sideways part falls down when the corner isn’t deep enough. We perhaps don’t have to when it’s deep enough. We otherwise just place and fuse the bend corner of the pipe. The other pipe isn’t that bothered by falling. We fuse when being above. A lubricant (glijmiddel in Dutch) with human hands is maybe not that bad in the end.

Again, the lifting platforms and elevators with optionaly two open sides could have dirges (a bit like the sides of a bowling ally, so it more round).

We should be fastened when being above with a safety net, in case we fall (see way above).

The hydrocarbons should of course be pumped inside the container at the start.

We can build EVERYTHING from the bottom to the top.

I MAYBE EXAGGERATE THE HIGHT OF THE COMBUSTION ENIGINE IN THE END, WHEN IT COMES TO THE MEASURES, SO WE WOULDN’T NEED LIFTING PLATFORMS IN THAT CASE, BUT ROLLING THE PIPES COMES IN HANDY. ON THE OTHER HAND: THE CEILING DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THAT HIGH. I PROBABLY EXAGGERATE THE HIGHT OF THE COMBUSTION ENIGINE IN THE END, SO WE WOULDN’T NEED THE LIFTING PLATFORMS IN THAT CASE, BUT ROLLING THE PIPES COMES IN HANDY. ON THE OTHER HAND: THE CEILING DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THAT HIGH.

We can maybe push with a lubricant (glijmiddel in dutch) when the catalyst is relatively smaĺl compared to incredibly giant ones.

The end

SEE THE PLANS WAY ABOVE!!!!!

I ALSO DON’T KNOW IF ENOUGH OXYGEN SOLVATES INSIDE THE HYDROCARBONS, SO WE WOULD OTHERWISE INCREASE THE OXYGEN LEVEL INSIDE THE CONTAINER (MAYBED PURE OXYGEN).

THE MATARIALS OF EVERYTHING CAN DIFFER. The pipes and container can be build of carbon fiber as example. The hatches can perhaps have a different matarial too as example. The pipes are normally metalic like the container.

I of course knew all the time that the hydrocarbons are ignited by a spark plug.

IF IT DOESN’T WORK THEN TRY HARDER. I know it’s incredibly hard to make. I know this plan sucks balls, but it can only work with Grotentraast gold.

TRUST ME!!!!!

I wanted to replace the O for oxygen with something else a long time ago, but that could be unnecessary.

We should maybe transport hydrocarbons to other Earth like planets.

Those gold bars are very expensive, and it also takes a lot of hard work, so I suppose that we could arrange a worldwide investment opportunity, because the energy supply would pay everything back, and we should also reward the investers for kickstarting it of course and the sample builders should have a share. We can also tape the building sample. The builders afterward should have a high salary. The 3D software could probably fund it though, so I’m being nice. We could maybe be open to investers to be fair, but we don’t need them. There is a limit how much a single invester can invest. The reward shouldn’t be too high too or I would rather finance it myself.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I guess that making a half ring pipe around the combustion engine, while maintaining the same pipe height maybe works. We would have a coaxial rotor just after the beginning of the pipe or just before the end and maybe both in this case or even three. With the catalyst inside the combustion engine. I had the idea earlier, but I ditched it because I didn’t believe.

It’s not necessarily about the money, but I just like it when the catalyst is the only way.

I estimate that our oil reserves would ony last about 16 years on a new planet with our current population. I read that although a couple of planets have been found in the habitale zones in the Universe, they still seem to lack life by not supporting it’s chemistry, but NASA is into 12 conservative Habitable zone like planets, and besides also a lot of planets, which ask optimism, but who knows, although many of them are unfortunately too hot to be Earth like, unlike luckily kepler-186f at a whooping distance of around 560 lightyears from Earth, but not out of bounds with the warp drive We don’t know if it has the right atmosphere yet.

It’s not sure if the oil resources thrive on other planets though, while the sediment layer is perhaps too thin to provide oil, so they could lack a meteor strike. Hopping from planet to planet is a no go, because we construct a lot of things on a planet, and interstellar travel of electricty is very complicated, while it probably barely provides net energy, which means that the oil would even last a lot shorter. Spacetravel for cargo is a no-go, because it’s way too dangerous and also pointless.

Spaceshipping of oil probably won’t work, because it takes more energy than it provides on Earth. We indeed wouldn’t need that oil on Earth anyway. Other planets perhaps don’t even have oil, unless they have been struck by a meteor.